Searching for Warning No So Timestamp Support Falling Back To Siocgstamp information? Find all needed info by using official links provided below.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/guinness-list/2000-December/msg00800.html
I think it's trying to use the TSC (Time Stamp Counter ?) function of the CPU. It should be more accurate that way. I tried it because: 1) the warning mentioned _falling_ back to SIOCGSTAMP 2) the -U option said "(the old behaviour)" And it quieted the warning :) Now why My athlon with TSC in the CPU doesn't use SO_TIMESTAMP is probably a bug.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/guinness-list/2000-December/msg00767.html
James I used to find this realy annoying. I use redhat 6.2 and came accross this when I updated to iputils-20001010-1.6x.i386.rpm. Then one day it disappeared. This coincided with a kernel rebuild. I suspect that you are running the default kernel which doesn't support SO_TIMESTAMP. hope this helps ...
https://answers.splunk.com/answers/779316/does-splunk-log-falling-back-to-automatic-timestam.html
If I don't hear back from you, then, based on your answer and subsequent comments, I believe that the answer to my original question ("Does Splunk log falling back to automatic timestamp extraction?") is "no". I'll add a comment to your answer to that effect, and, with thanks for your input, accept your answer.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36041740/obtain-packet-timestamp-through-ioctl-call-on-socket-file-descriptor
Obtain packet timestamp through ioctl call on socket file descriptor. Ask Question ... I'm trying this now with SIOCGSTAMP, I've set SO_TIMESTAMP option to 0 with setsockopt. However the ioctl call is still returning -1. Must I enable the SIOCGSTAMP or can it be that it is not supported by the device driver? ... so he has scaled back his ...
https://sourceforge.net/p/backuppc/mailman/message/5776051/
BackupPC Mailing Lists Brought to you by: cbarratt , stephen14
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11731445/timestamp-outgoing-packets
SO_TIMESTAMP / SO_TIMESTAMPNS / SO_TIMESTAMPING / SIOCGSTAMP / SIOCGSTAMPNS are similar. Anyone of them will enable application getting the timestamp of a received packet. With SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE, any one of the above flags will also provide the application a CMSG in MSG_ERRQUEUE, indicating the timestamp of a sent packet.
https://support.cloudbees.com/hc/en-us/articles/209641937-How-to-configure-Access-Control-for-Builds-
Apr 06, 2018 · How to configure Access Control for Builds? ... Warning: you have no plugins providing access control for builds, so falling back to legacy behavior of permitting any downstream builds to be triggered or. Warning: `Access Control for Builds` in global security configuration is empty, so falling back to legacy behavior of permitting any ...
http://lion3875.blog.sohu.com/156720503.html
Jul 19, 2010 · SO_TIMESTAMP，一个Socket选项，在权威著作《Unix网络编程》中未提及到，即使在google上也难找到其详细解释与用法。然而在开源代码ptpv2d-rc1中用到了这个socket选项，那么它到底是用来做什么的呢。
How to find Warning No So Timestamp Support Falling Back To Siocgstamp information?
Follow the instuctions below:
- Choose an official link provided above.
- Click on it.
- Find company email address & contact them via email
- Find company phone & make a call.
- Find company address & visit their office.
